[bump worthy]

BumpWorthy => Missing Items & Requests => Topic started by: PolarLight on January 27, 2010, 10:21:17 AM

Title: Please hold on!
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2010, 10:21:17 AM
requesting a bump before Korgoth (in 2006) and a little bit edited one before Family Guy (in 2007)
it started with repeated words "Please hold on" "Hang on for eyelings"
the music was On No - Seventeen i guess
thank you
Title: Re: Please hold on!
Post by: Anonymous on January 28, 2010, 06:49:57 PM
requesting a bump before Korgoth (in 2006) and a little bit edited one before Family Guy (in 2007)
it started with repeated words "Please hold on" "Hang on for eyelings"
the music was On Ho - Seventeen i guess
thank you
If it helps any of the archivists, the one before Family Guy aired (Sunday,) March 18, 2007.
Title: Re: Please hold on!
Post by: Anonymous on January 28, 2010, 07:05:53 PM
I don't have either of those sadly  :-(
Title: Re: Please hold on!
Post by: Anonymous on January 28, 2010, 09:45:13 PM
I know what bump you're talking about. I feel like I've seen it on the site though, cuz it's still like.. fresh in my mind.
Title: Re: Please hold on!
Post by: Anonymous on January 28, 2010, 10:11:38 PM
@bumperella - yes ma'am it does  :-D Thank You. I had tracked down two airings of Korgoth but was still empty handed.

@terrorist96 - nothing visual (in this version anyway) so it was unlikely to be here. I searched 'seventeen' (which is a known track) and only came up with the Advisory - surprising. As for it being fresh in your mind it's quite possible they recycled the idea.

@PolarLight - you are correct about the track but you had a little typo there  :wink: it's by Oh No


It's in the queue  :wink: ~> http://www.bumpworthy.com/bumps/2085

Also found the Korgoth airing September 17, 2006 and then on Futurama on September 18, 2006 - both appropriately altered
Title: Re: Please hold on!
Post by: Anonymous on January 29, 2010, 06:22:26 AM
ups...of course, it's Oh No :-D
much thanks for bump :mrgreen: :wink:
Title: Re: Please hold on!
Post by: Anonymous on January 29, 2010, 12:25:15 PM
 :-D No worries, the correction was more for someone who may stumble by here down the line  :wink: